Initially Posted by -JLT-
whereas I do like the brand new X5M/X6M, I might a lot favor the smaller, extra nimble X3M/X4M … and no, i am not bias
I agree. For us this dimension class hits the candy spot completely as effectively – sufficiently small in tight parking tons for ease of manuevering, glorious dealing with, but nonetheless offering a great deal of efficiency and cargo area (at the least the F97). I meant to take a picture a number of days in the past for Switch however acquired busy and forgot. He indicated in a a lot earlier thread he would take pleasure in ‘500hp mulch runs’, and I did have a full load of backyard soil, pine bark nuggets, and three gal crops and it held all simply.
And I virtually added a line within the chart for the Weight/Energy ratio contemplating IND’s Dyno and quarter mile information, confirmed by the Sim, that it most likely is extra within the vary of eight.four for the F97/98. Will see how future information pans out for the sequence to see if this was BMW massaging the numbers for the sequence line so the F97/98 would not usurp their bigger, costlier siblings within the efficiency numbers. Not that it ought to matter, for these within the F95/96 usually tend to need the finer cabin and suspension parts these present, no matter these efficiency variations.
Initially Posted by calbear550
Wow nice info. Thanks for placing all of it collectively like this!