Quote:

Initially Posted by -JLT-

whereas I do like the brand new X5M/X6M, I might a lot favor the smaller, extra nimble X3M/X4M … and no, i am not bias

I agree. For us this dimension class hits the candy spot completely as effectively – sufficiently small in tight parking tons for ease of manuevering, glorious dealing with, but nonetheless offering a great deal of efficiency and cargo area (at the least the F97). I meant to take a picture a number of days in the past for Switch however acquired busy and forgot. He indicated in a a lot earlier thread he would take pleasure in ‘500hp mulch runs’, and I did have a full load of backyard soil, pine bark nuggets, and three gal crops and it held all simply.

And I virtually added a line within the chart for the Weight/Energy ratio contemplating IND’s Dyno and quarter mile information, confirmed by the Sim, that it most likely is extra within the vary of eight.four for the F97/98. Will see how future information pans out for the sequence to see if this was BMW massaging the numbers for the sequence line so the F97/98 would not usurp their bigger, costlier siblings within the efficiency numbers. Not that it ought to matter, for these within the F95/96 usually tend to need the finer cabin and suspension parts these present, no matter these efficiency variations.

Quote:

Initially Posted by calbear550
View Post

Wow nice info. Thanks for placing all of it collectively like this!

Thanks, calbear550

Author

Write A Comment